The New York Times and John Bolton


David Frum points out the fallacy of the NYT news story that much of the reform of the UN has already happened and that Bolton is irrelevant.

Of course, this dovetails with their EDITORIAL position today,that the silver lining behind Bolton's appointment is that he can't do harm elsewhere while he is at the United Nations.  One wonders if Bolton was so yesterday, why the Times and Democrats in Congress have been on the warpath against him from Day One.

Ed Lasky    8 02 05