May 3, 2007
Socialist loses temper in French presidential debate
Last night's televised debate between Nicolas Sarkozy and Ségolène Royal, held prior to Sunday's run-off election for President of France, may have produced a decisive moment, as the socialist Royal apparently lost her temper and was called on it by Sarkozy. The New York Times reports:
Toward the end of the debate, Ms. Royal became agitated during a discussion of educating disabled children. She argued that the right had undone the good work that the left had been trying to do, and cast Mr. Sarkozy's position as "the height of political immorality."She accused him of playing the compassion card even though his government had not delivered needed services, indignantly telling him he had described the plight of handicapped children "with a tear in your eye."Mr. Sarkozy grabbed the opportunity to bore in on his point that she could not lead France in such a temperamental fashion."Calm down," he told her."No, I will not calm down," she replied."Do not point at me with this finger, with this--" he said."No. Yes," she said."With this index finger pointed, because frankly--""No, I will not calm down," she said. "No, I will not calm down. I will not calm down.""To be president of the republic, you have to be calm," he said.She responded: "Not when there are injustices. There are angers that are perfectly healthy because they correspond to people's suffering. There are angers I will have even when I am president of the republic."In the middle of her sentence, Mr. Sarkozy tried to stop her, asking, "Madame Royal, would you allow me to say one word?" But she ignored him.His voice took on a patronizing tone. "I don't know why the usually calm Madame Royal has lost her nerve," he said.Mr. Sarkozy repeatedly tried to paint Ms. Royal as uninformed. She tried to paint him as overbearing. There was equal-time interruption.Making this race even more compelling, political analysts were divided on who had "won" the debate, Ségo or Sarko, as they call them here.Mr. Sarkozy got points for not losing his temper. But Ms. Royal's losing her temper caused different reactions. Some found it exhilarating, a sign that the left would not be complacent. Others found it unnerving. No one found it boring.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Antisemitism in the Guise of Humanism
- Escaping the State of Sin
- Outsquatting the Squatters
- From Illegal Alien Invaders to Newcomers to Democrats
- The Impact of China-Linked Contractors on U.S. Security
- Debunking the Stupid, Yet Passionately Held, Myths About the 1994 Crime Bill
- The Death of the American Salesman
- The Alarm Bell Is Clanging
- Voting and the Meaning of Honor
- Exploding The Myth That Islam Is An Abrahamic Religion
Blog Posts
- So was Hunter Biden 'Our Man in Ukraine'?
- The suspect who smashed Kaylee Gain’s head into the pavement claims she’s the victim
- About those innocent Palestinian civilians...
- The GOP seems to be on the verge of capitulating before the Democrats, again!
- Biden and the insurmountable
- Universe twice as old as we’ve been told?
- Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
- Can Letitia James handle the rough world of property management?
- It’s time to stop accommodating the crazies in America
- The value of perspective
- And then they voted Democrat in November
- Trump towers in his mastery of words to rally voters
- Planet Fitness loses $400 million in value after banning woman who exposed the company’s anti-female stance
- Schadenfreude: New movie labeling white people ‘dangerous animals’ flops at box office
- Why are American youths so unhappy?