June 23, 2008
Condensed Version of McCain's Ottawa Speech
On June 20, John McCain delivered a 2,000-words speech to the Economic Club of Canada. In case you missed it, he's a paraphrased condensed version in outline form, with the word count allotted to each topic indicated. Brief comments will follow.
Introduction (85 words)Thanks for inviting me.Context: Canada & U.S. Relations (246)The U.S. is lucky to have Canada as our neighbors, friends and allies.General Trade Relations Between U.S. & Canada (171)Our economies are interdependent, and that's been good for both of us.Main Topics (70) [outlines main body of speech]We share (A) security (B) environmental (C) energy, and (D) trade [not mentioned in the intro] interests and concerns.A. Security1. Bilateral Security (229)We'll continue efforts to secure our shared border and cooperate on planning together for emergencies.2. Global Security (428)Americans appreciated Canadian sympathy after 9/11. We realize Canada has suffered casualties in Afghanistan, and has rendered considerable financial aid in both Iraq and Afghanistan. I share the objection of many Canadians to GITMO and will close it. Going forward, I'll seek and welcome your advice on such issues.B. Global Warming (238)The planet faces "grave environmental dangers that global warming can bring." As president, I will pursue a "sensible cap-and-trade emissions system" in common cause with Canada.C. Energy (61)The U.S. and Canada "stand much to gain by harmonizing our energy policies."D. NAFTA (248)As president, I will honor our NAFTA agreements, and work to strengthen and improve NAFTA.Close (210)Our relationship has not always been smooth, but it's always been productive, based on good will and mutual admiration. And so it will continue. [End]
Nothing in this speech seems to represent anything new coming from McCain. He wanted the Canadians to know that he accepts the premise of man-made global warming, doesn't share the Democrats bashing of NAFTA, and will be more solicitous of their opinions than has been the current administration (the meta-message in that instance).
One question: Just what is the U.S. energy policy that McCain proposes to "harmonize" with Canada? And how?
Since the audience wasn't made up of U.S. voters, McCain did not, and had no need to, differentiate himself from Barack Obama. Or should he have?
Suggestion: Read the entire speech and ask yourself: How much of this speech could not have been delivered by Obama?
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Antisemitism in the Guise of Humanism
- Escaping the State of Sin
- Outsquatting the Squatters
- From Illegal Alien Invaders to Newcomers to Democrats
- The Impact of China-Linked Contractors on U.S. Security
- Debunking the Stupid, Yet Passionately Held, Myths About the 1994 Crime Bill
- The Death of the American Salesman
- The Alarm Bell Is Clanging
- Voting and the Meaning of Honor
- Exploding The Myth That Islam Is An Abrahamic Religion
Blog Posts
- So was Hunter Biden 'Our Man in Ukraine'?
- The suspect who smashed Kaylee Gain’s head into the pavement claims she’s the victim
- About those innocent Palestinian civilians...
- The GOP seems to be on the verge of capitulating before the Democrats, again!
- Biden and the insurmountable
- Universe twice as old as we’ve been told?
- Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
- Can Letitia James handle the rough world of property management?
- It’s time to stop accommodating the crazies in America
- The value of perspective
- And then they voted Democrat in November
- Trump towers in his mastery of words to rally voters
- Planet Fitness loses $400 million in value after banning woman who exposed the company’s anti-female stance
- Schadenfreude: New movie labeling white people ‘dangerous animals’ flops at box office
- Why are American youths so unhappy?