April 29, 2009
UAW to bargain with subsidized companies it controls
Let's get this straight: taxpayers are being placed on the hook for keeping automakers solvent, and now the UAW will be bargaining with itself on wages, benefits, and work rules.
Call it a bailout or restructuring. What you're seeing is not a new beginning for the homegrown auto sector. It's the culmination of a decades-old, dishonestly peddled auto policy.The two parties that turned the Big Three into a perennially limping freak of unwritten industrial policy now will take formal ownership of their handiwork. The United Auto Workers (UAW) would own 39% of GM. The federal government would own 50%. The creditors will be shafted with just 10%. (In the Chrysler plan being discussed, labor would own 55%, making it effectively a subsidiary of the UAW.)The day after any such settlement is finalized, the clock will start ticking down to the next collective-bargaining session between a monopoly UAW and what remains of the Big Three -- though now the UAW would be sitting on both sides of the table.
The possibility of UAW ownership and this delicious collective bargaining scenario was first offered in American Thinker last November. And yesterday's update posed the question of how well the UAW's (and taxpayers') equity "investment" in Chrysler will do when the auto companies are saddled with the "green" car imperatives of the Obama administration.
But what about the auto company that has had the wherewithal to manage without direct federal bailouts and remain free of government and UAW ownership? How will Ford fare in competition with a GM and Chrysler owned by labor and government. Read the rest of Jenkins' article which describes "the basic dynamics of the homegrown auto sector--a labor monoploy combined with endless finagles in Washington to help the Big Three survive competition from Japanese, German and Korean auto makers." Though Jenkins doesn't deal with the question of Ford, I doubt he would expect it to be competing on a level playing field.
Ed Lasky adds:
With the UAW owning huge percentages of both Chrysler and General Motors, has anyone questioned the fringe benefits politically to the Democrats? The unions will be in a prime "bargaining" position, able to extract vast amount of money that might otherwise gone to shareholders, people who loaned money to the company, or technological development funding to actually make affordable cars.
Taxpayers will be on the hook for billions of dollars forwarded to these companies. Money is fungible, so how much of this money will move into the accounts that fund union political activities? Or go toward high salaries of union officials?
This risk is exacerbated by the fact that the Obama administration has rolled back the requirement that labor unions and their leaders report information about their finances and compensation.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Antisemitism in the Guise of Humanism
- Escaping the State of Sin
- Outsquatting the Squatters
- From Illegal Alien Invaders to Newcomers to Democrats
- The Impact of China-Linked Contractors on U.S. Security
- Debunking the Stupid, Yet Passionately Held, Myths About the 1994 Crime Bill
- The Death of the American Salesman
- The Alarm Bell Is Clanging
- Voting and the Meaning of Honor
- Exploding The Myth That Islam Is An Abrahamic Religion
Blog Posts
- So was Hunter Biden 'Our Man in Ukraine'?
- The suspect who smashed Kaylee Gain’s head into the pavement claims she’s the victim
- About those innocent Palestinian civilians...
- The GOP seems to be on the verge of capitulating before the Democrats, again!
- Biden and the insurmountable
- Universe twice as old as we’ve been told?
- Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
- Can Letitia James handle the rough world of property management?
- It’s time to stop accommodating the crazies in America
- The value of perspective
- And then they voted Democrat in November
- Trump towers in his mastery of words to rally voters
- Planet Fitness loses $400 million in value after banning woman who exposed the company’s anti-female stance
- Schadenfreude: New movie labeling white people ‘dangerous animals’ flops at box office
- Why are American youths so unhappy?