NY Times to charge online users for access to content
                
Will it work?
Obviously, it depends on whether readers think the  Times' journalism is worth paying for, and it depends as well on how  much the Times will be charging. The conservative Wall Street  Journal -- unlike the ultraliberal Times -- charges a hefty  subscription rate for its popular online content, and the Journal  also happens to be the nation's biggest circulation newspaper.
Let's admit something. The Times does occasionally  pull off some first-rate journalism, even as its conservative critics rightly  criticize it for the liberal spin it puts on its supposedly objective news  articles. However, first-rate journalism alone does not necessarily mean that  loyal Times readers will be willing to cough up a subscription  fee.
I say that based on who the Times readers  are (compared to those of the Wall Street Journal), and I say that  based on a regular look that I take of the most e-mailed articles at  the Times and Journal.
To paraphrase an old saying: Show me who your readers are, and  I'll show you who you are. Well, take a look at some of the most  e-mailed article at the Times and Journal, and it obviously  says something about what's important those papers readers, and it says  something about their values and worldview. This of course raises another  question: Would these readers be willing to pay for the types of stories that  they are so quick to e-mail?
Here, as of mid-afternoon today, are some of the most  e-mailed stories from the Wall Street Journal and New York  Times:
Wall Street Journal:
1. Opinion: Boston  Tea Party
2. Opinion: Lanny J. Davis: Blame the Left for Massachusetts
3.  Opinion: The Message of Massachusetts
4. Opinion: Terry Miller: The U.S.  Isn't as Free as It Used to Be
5. Unfinished Projects Weigh on Banks
6.  How to Buy Disability Insurance
7. GOP Victory Upends Senate
8. May I Hate  the Saints?
9. Opinion: Michael Mann's Climate Stimulus
10. Opinion: The  Great D.C. Migration
New York  Times:




