PrintMarch 15, 2010
AT Readers: Call Your Blue Dog
The House will likely vote on the Senate health care bill and a bill with changes to the Senate version (the reconciliation package), sometime next weekend, probably at 3 in the morning Saturday night. Alternatively, the leadership may try to make it look like the Democrats are not voting for anything other than a rule (the Slaughter approach).
With all House Republicans voting no, Speaker Pelosi can lose no more than 37 Democrats to get to the 216 she needs (current lineup: 253 Democrats, 178 Republicans). 39 Democrats voted no on the House bill that passed 220-215 in November, but since that time, one no voting Democrat has tickled and retired (Congressman Massa), and one switched to the GOP in Alabama (Parker Griffith).
Jay Cost of realclearpolitics.com has been keeping track of the no votes who could vote yes this time (37), and the yes votes who may vote no this time (27). Cost thinks only 10 of the 37 no votes are really in play.
Politico is reporting that 34 Democrats are now announced or leaning to no votes. I suspect that only Nancy Pelosi knows the the real number who might shift from each camp.
American Thinker readers can get involved in the action, by calling the offices of the 64 Democrats whose votes may be in play. Phone calls are far more important than emails. Here is a list of the phone numbers of all Congressmen. If the final vote is very close (e.g 216-215, or 217-214), I would wager the bill passes. This means the no side needs a few votes to spare, or the pressure on the last holdout or two will simply be to great to resist.
With all House Republicans voting no, Speaker Pelosi can lose no more than 37 Democrats to get to the 216 she needs (current lineup: 253 Democrats, 178 Republicans). 39 Democrats voted no on the House bill that passed 220-215 in November, but since that time, one no voting Democrat has tickled and retired (Congressman Massa), and one switched to the GOP in Alabama (Parker Griffith).
Jay Cost of realclearpolitics.com has been keeping track of the no votes who could vote yes this time (37), and the yes votes who may vote no this time (27). Cost thinks only 10 of the 37 no votes are really in play.
Politico is reporting that 34 Democrats are now announced or leaning to no votes. I suspect that only Nancy Pelosi knows the the real number who might shift from each camp.
American Thinker readers can get involved in the action, by calling the offices of the 64 Democrats whose votes may be in play. Phone calls are far more important than emails. Here is a list of the phone numbers of all Congressmen. If the final vote is very close (e.g 216-215, or 217-214), I would wager the bill passes. This means the no side needs a few votes to spare, or the pressure on the last holdout or two will simply be to great to resist.
It is particularly important for Congressmen to hear from those who live in their district (first home, second home, does not matter). But if you choose to get involved, call as many of the Congressmen as you can. If you are a Medicare recipient, that is worth communicating. If you are a union member opposed to Obama care, that is helpful to reveal.
Arguments are important; the new entitlement will cost 200 billion a year by 2019, and grow at 8% a year thereafter. With deficits running at $1.5 trillion a year, and federal spending already running at record levels since World War 2 at over 25% of GDP, this spending will mean new debt, and higher deficits (the costs will undoubtedly be greater than the estimates). Nothing in this bill will control spending. Only by excluding the Medicare doctors' payment fix, treating the collections and payments for the new long term care insurance plan in the bill on an annual basis, rather than as an actuary would, and by collecting new taxes and fees for ten years, and paying for new programs over six years (beginning in 2014), has the ten year CBO estimate come in at the level it has. In essence, the CBO has ben asked to count A , but not B.
Arguments are important; the new entitlement will cost 200 billion a year by 2019, and grow at 8% a year thereafter. With deficits running at $1.5 trillion a year, and federal spending already running at record levels since World War 2 at over 25% of GDP, this spending will mean new debt, and higher deficits (the costs will undoubtedly be greater than the estimates). Nothing in this bill will control spending. Only by excluding the Medicare doctors' payment fix, treating the collections and payments for the new long term care insurance plan in the bill on an annual basis, rather than as an actuary would, and by collecting new taxes and fees for ten years, and paying for new programs over six years (beginning in 2014), has the ten year CBO estimate come in at the level it has. In essence, the CBO has ben asked to count A , but not B.
The League of American Voters is running ads in the districts of some of the wavering Democrats. You can contribute to this effort with this link.
Our side can not offer bribes, or future jobs for Congressmen who are defeated in November as a result of a yes vote, or twist arms like Obama can (my Presidency is at stake) or Pelosi can (be loyal), or break legs or jab and scream like a naked Rahm Emanuel.
But we can phone and help pay for ads. Do it.
To comment on this or any other American Thinker article or blog, you must be a subscriber to our ad-free service. Login to your subscription to access the comments section. You can subscribe on a monthly basis for $6.79 a month or for a year at $69.99
Login
Subscribe / Change PwdAd Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Antisemitism in the Guise of Humanism
- Escaping the State of Sin
- Outsquatting the Squatters
- From Illegal Alien Invaders to Newcomers to Democrats
- The Impact of China-Linked Contractors on U.S. Security
- Debunking the Stupid, Yet Passionately Held, Myths About the 1994 Crime Bill
- The Death of the American Salesman
- The Alarm Bell Is Clanging
- Voting and the Meaning of Honor
- Exploding The Myth That Islam Is An Abrahamic Religion
Blog Posts
- So was Hunter Biden 'Our Man in Ukraine'?
- The suspect who smashed Kaylee Gain’s head into the pavement claims she’s the victim
- About those innocent Palestinian civilians...
- The GOP seems to be on the verge of capitulating before the Democrats, again!
- Biden and the insurmountable
- Universe twice as old as we’ve been told?
- Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
- Can Letitia James handle the rough world of property management?
- It’s time to stop accommodating the crazies in America
- The value of perspective
- And then they voted Democrat in November
- Trump towers in his mastery of words to rally voters
- Planet Fitness loses $400 million in value after banning woman who exposed the company’s anti-female stance
- Schadenfreude: New movie labeling white people ‘dangerous animals’ flops at box office
- Why are American youths so unhappy?