January 21, 2011
		Has representative government ceased to exist in Illinois?
Last  April, bus loads of public union employees descended upon the state  capitol to bully the legislature into passing a 1% tax increase. The  crowd of 10-15 thousand public servants carried signs and banners while  chanting “raise my taxes, raise my taxes.” The Chicago Tribune  reported that union leader Harry Bayer menaced the legislators by  threatening “If you try to leave town without doing your job, we’re  going to chase you down.” Many in the crowd were members of Illinois  powerful teacher’s  union who played hooky for the day to lend their support in the battle  against the taxpayers. At stake was a taxpayer bailout of the exorbitant  public sector union pension system.
With  an election on the horizon, Illinois legislators found the courage to  hold the line on Governor Quinn’s proposed new tax. During the campaign  season relatively few members of the legislature were willing to support  any new taxes and risk arousing the ire of their constituents. In  November Illinoisans went to the polls and expressed their overwhelming  opposition to any new tax increases.
Fast-forward  to the post-holiday lame-duck session of the Illinois legislature, an  ever larger and more destructive tax hike was on the agenda. Strangely  enough there were no bus loads of public sector union operatives  surrounding the statehouse, in fact there was virtual silence from the  usual agitators. Perhaps the anger of the already overburdened taxpayers  and private sector employers had become so obvious that even the most  hard-core union campaigners decided to stay home. Perhaps the union  leadership knew that the fix was in, which as it turns out they had one  of their own inside the statehouse who was ready, willing and enabled to  betray the taxpayers.
When  the roll was called, the largest tax increase in state history was  passed with the absolute minimum number of votes required. In reading the list  of Democrat party representatives who cast their votes against the will  of their constituents, the usual suspects were evident, led by Speaker  Michael Madigan (D-Chicago) and Senate President John Cullerton  (D-Chicago). Also on the list were a number of legislators who had been  rejected by the voters in November and were now free to either exact  their revenge or pad their resume in  hopes of landing a job in the bloated state bureaucracy or the Quinn  administration.
Buried in the middle of the dishonor roll was the name of Kathleen Moore. A quick check of the bio page on the legislature’s web site revealed virtually nothing. Kathleen Moore was listed as a member of Illinois’ 96th  legislature, but there was no photo, no phone number, fax or email  contact information, no office number and no committee memberships. All  we could tell from the official web site was that someone named Kathleen  Moore had been a member of the general assembly.
Incredulous  that a total non-entity could have been in a position to cast a vote of  such monumental importance which would effect every single citizen in  Illinois, I started to do a little digging. My state representative Jack  Franks (D-Woodstock) had vowed to do everything in his power to stop  the tax hike and prior to the vote he gave an impassioned speech (in  which he praised Barack Obama-to what end?) on the floor of the general  assembly . Mr. Franks did vote against the measure and seemed sincere in  his opposition, so as a concerned constituent I emailed Jack and asked  if he knew anything about Kathleen Moore. As of this writing I have  received no response.
Not  willing to fully trust my local Democrat representative, I also sent a  similar email to my state senator Pam Although (R-Crystal Lake) in hope  of finding out who Kathleen Moore was and what she was doing in the  legislature for the crucial vote. As with her Democrat colleague, Ms.  Althoff has yet to respond.
Who is Kathleen Moore? Well, here is what Andy Shaw, executive director of the Better Government Association has revealed  about the phantom legislator. Kathleen (Kathy) Moore is the wife of the  politically well connected Chicago zoning attorney Tom Moore. Mrs.  Moore is a retired public school teacher with a vested interest in the  troubled union pension fund and she has never run for elective office  before. Yet this woman was allowed to vote for the most controversial  tax hike in Illinois history, during the final hours of the lame-duck  session.
How could this happen? The incumbent 11th  district representative, John Fritchey (D-Chicago) was elected to the  Cook County Board and assumed his new office in December. The  representative-elect, Democrat Ann Williams was not inclined to vote for  the proposed tax hike, so she chose not to fill out the remainder of  Fritchey’s term. Rather than leave the seat vacant for the final few  days of the session and risk passage of the tax hike, the party  leadership found a ‘ringer’ to put their toxic agenda over the top.
Andy  Shaw tells us that Mrs. Moore admitted at a party the week before her  brief stint in the general assembly “they tell me what (voting) button  to push and I push it.” Rumors that Ann Williams had been pressured to  either vote for the tax hike or decline to fill the seat until the next  session have been denied by her predecessor John Fritchey, who said “let  me be 100% clear, at NO time did I ever pressure or even ask, Ann Williams to vote for an income tax hike. Period.
In  response to the question of why Ann Williams refused to be seated in  order to fill out the balance of his term, Fritchey said.
…for reasons known only to Ann Williams, she refused to be appointed early to the office for which she had campaigned for over a year. Her decision meant that there would have been no representative for the people of the 11th district at a time when matters ranging from abolition of the death penalty to approval of medical cannabis were set to be heard by the legislature. Her decision forced the appointment of an interim Representative for the two-week period leading up to her inauguration yesterday.
Of course,  passionate denials of dirty dealing has become a precise science in  Illinois’ Democrat Party and here in the ‘Land of Lincoln’  investigations into wrongdoing by the party leadership are very, very  rare.
It does appear  awfully strange that no one seemed to question the presence of an  un-qualified stranger in their midst during such a crucial time. There  seems to have been no publicity surrounding the appointment, no  discussion of qualifications and no impediment to Mrs. Moore’s  appointment. 
If only one  member of the legislature had questioned the appointment of the  unqualified Kathleen Moore, it is possible that the job killing tax hike  may have been stopped. If only one of our elected representatives would  have put their constituents and the overburdened taxpayers first, the  tax increase could have been halted. If just one of our duly elected  leaders had gone on TV or the radio to shed some light on the  machinations of the Democrat leadership, then the people of Illinois may  have been spared this disastrous bill.
Sadly, no one  cared enough about the taxpayers and private sector employers in  Illinois to do the right thing. Even after the fact, there is virtually  no interest in exposing this betrayal of the principles of  representative government in Illinois. Our elected officials and the MSM  talk and pound their chest about the horrible tax hike and its dire  consequences, but then turn a blind eye to the corrupt process that  brought it into being.
January 21, 2011




