No Congressional Oversight for 'Limited' Military Action?
This  President continues to bewilder me with his misguided and dangerous  interpretations of existing law. His suggestion today that our role in  Libya does not require further Congressional approval simply because he  deems it to be "limited" is, on its face, absurd. 
The 1973 War Powers  Act, clearly defines the ability of Congress to balance Executive Power  by defining the length of any military engagement. 
The 1973 War Powers Act,  requires that, "within sixty calendar days" the President must  "terminate any use of United States Armed Forces...unless the Congress"  has either "declared war" or "has extended by law such sixty day  period." Finally, the act states that military forces "engaged in  hostilities outside the territory of the United States...shall be  removed by the President if the Congress so directs by concurrent  resolution." 
Note it did not delineate the size or scope of the military  engagement. It is not inferred, implied, or expressly stated, that the  President can bypass Congressional oversight because he deems the  engagement to be so "limited" in scope that such oversight in  unnecessary. The act clearly states, "any use of United States Armed  Forces" and does not define any exclusions, conditions, or exceptions,  to the ability of Congress to oversee active military engagements. 
The  suggestion by the President, that Congress's oversight is conditioned  upon his approval is not only in violation of the War Powers Act, but  the U.S. Constitution. Each branch of government is provided separate  and equal powers that "check and balance" the other two branches. The  President can exercise his powers as Commander in Chief absent the  pre-consent of Congress but cannot act outside its oversight. The power  of the people, by way of Congress, to oversee and interfere with the  actions of the President are guaranteed and are not subject to the  Executive's whims or discretion. 
This  President has made it his policy to ignore, distort, and bypass,  standing law and legal doctrine. Far beyond any President in recent  history, this administration is best described as lawless, reckless, and  arrogant. Whether disregarding Constitutional precedent by legislating  the American people buy health insurance, ignoring the orders of federal  courts, or manipulating existing laws to meet his political agenda,  Barack Obama has come to epitomize the stereotype of a corrupt  politician.
 
Frank GuttingFrank is a Conservative blogger and founder of www.iteaparty.org




