Taxing Dancers
Nite Moves, a strip club in the Albany, New York, area, has waged a legal battle since 2005 against the state's Department of Taxation and Finance over whether its private "lap dances" ought to be exempt from sales tax -- just like ballet performances and Broadway shows are, a status intended by the legislature to promote cultural and artistic performances.
On Tuesday, New York's highest court finally weighed into the legal row, narrowly ruling that lap dances are indeed taxable because, among other reasons, they don't qualify as "choreographed performances" as do Broadway shows and ballet performances. The Court of Appeals, furthermore, noted in its 4-3 decision that "women gyrating on a pole to music, however artistic or athletic their practiced moves are, was also not a qualifying performance entitled to exempt status." (You can read the entire decision, here.)
The court's majority was divided between two Republicans and two Democrats, and the dissenting judges included two Republicans and one Democrat - so it seems that political ideology wasn't a factor in this amusing legal skirmish.
Judge Robert S. Smith, a Republican, penned an amusing and perceptive dissenting opinion that criticized the majority for making "a distinction between highbrow dance and lowbrow dance that is not to be found in the governing statute and raises significant constitutional problems."
"Like the majority...I find this particular form of dance unedifying -- indeed, I am stuffy enough to find it distasteful," he wrote. "Perhaps for similar reasons, I do not read Hustler magazine; I would rather read the New Yorker. I would be appalled, however, if the State were to exact from Hustler a tax that the New Yorker did not have to pay, on the ground that what appears in Hustler is insufficiently 'cultural and artistic.' That sort of discrimination on the basis of content would surely be unconstitutional...It is not clear to me why the discrimination that the majority approves in this case stands on any firmer constitutional footing."
As a result of the ruling, Nite Moves reportedly could be liable for more than $500,000 in sales tax. The club's lawyer, W. Andrew McCullough, told the New York Times that he will probably ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Antisemitism in the Guise of Humanism
- Escaping the State of Sin
- Outsquatting the Squatters
- From Illegal Alien Invaders to Newcomers to Democrats
- The Impact of China-Linked Contractors on U.S. Security
- Debunking the Stupid, Yet Passionately Held, Myths About the 1994 Crime Bill
- The Death of the American Salesman
- The Alarm Bell Is Clanging
- Voting and the Meaning of Honor
- Exploding The Myth That Islam Is An Abrahamic Religion
Blog Posts
- So was Hunter Biden 'Our Man in Ukraine'?
- The suspect who smashed Kaylee Gain’s head into the pavement claims she’s the victim
- About those innocent Palestinian civilians...
- The GOP seems to be on the verge of capitulating before the Democrats, again!
- Biden and the insurmountable
- Universe twice as old as we’ve been told?
- Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
- Can Letitia James handle the rough world of property management?
- It’s time to stop accommodating the crazies in America
- The value of perspective
- And then they voted Democrat in November
- Trump towers in his mastery of words to rally voters
- Planet Fitness loses $400 million in value after banning woman who exposed the company’s anti-female stance
- Schadenfreude: New movie labeling white people ‘dangerous animals’ flops at box office
- Why are American youths so unhappy?