Swiss referendum may limit executive pay
The green eyed monster, envy, is inflaming people all around the world, even in usually sensible, pro-business, rich Switzerland. The Swiss, great believers in direct democracy, are going to the polls this week to vote on a referendum that would limit executive pay to a multiple of 12 times the pay of the lowest-salaried worker in an enterprise. Neil Maclucas of the Wall Street Journal writes:
On Nov. 24, voters will be asked to approve or reject the 1:12 Initiative for Fair Pay, which organizers say would address a growing wealth gap in Switzerland. The initiative is premised on the idea that no one in a company should earn more in a month than others earn in a year.
"Switzerland's wealth is very unfairly distributed," said David Roth, president of the youth wing of the Swiss Socialist Party, which gathered the 100,000 signatures needed to launch the ballot. "While top Swiss managers earn millions, more than 300,000 people in Switzerland have to work for a mere pittance."
The measure is unlikely to be passed, and has been losing support, probably because voters realize there would be an exit of corporate headquarters, and with them good paying jobs:
The latest poll released Wednesday, which was conducted between Nov. 1 and Nov. 8 by polling group gfs.bern for Swiss television, shows 36% of respondents in favor of the initiative, 54% against and 10% still undecided.
The group's previous poll in October showed 44% in favor, 44% against and 12% undecided.
The initiative needs a simple 50% approval rate to be adopted, and is then automatically written into the country's constitution. It doesn't require any subsequent parliamentary approval.

Underlying all such measures is the silly notion of a zero-sum economy -- that if somebody is creating wealth and getting rich, that makes other people poorer. That was true prior to the Mercantile and Industrial Revolutions. It is true when government makes transfer payments. But when free enterprise allows voluntary transactions, it becomes a pernicious lie.
The entire world, even the world's poor, is far richer than ever before in history. That enables some people to enjoy unimaginable wealth - private jets, yachts, multiple mansions, and collections of luxury cars. So what! If someone feels poor because Mark Zuckerberg has a lot of toys, that is a self-destructive emotion.
But the left thrives on pathological envy. Thus, we expect more efforts to enact laws limiting what high earners can make. The usual suspects on the wealthy left - people like George Soros and George Clooney - remain silent, of course.
Hat tip: David Paulin
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Antisemitism in the Guise of Humanism
- Escaping the State of Sin
- Outsquatting the Squatters
- From Illegal Alien Invaders to Newcomers to Democrats
- The Impact of China-Linked Contractors on U.S. Security
- Debunking the Stupid, Yet Passionately Held, Myths About the 1994 Crime Bill
- The Death of the American Salesman
- The Alarm Bell Is Clanging
- Voting and the Meaning of Honor
- Exploding The Myth That Islam Is An Abrahamic Religion
Blog Posts
- So was Hunter Biden 'Our Man in Ukraine'?
- The suspect who smashed Kaylee Gain’s head into the pavement claims she’s the victim
- About those innocent Palestinian civilians...
- The GOP seems to be on the verge of capitulating before the Democrats, again!
- Biden and the insurmountable
- Universe twice as old as we’ve been told?
- Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
- Can Letitia James handle the rough world of property management?
- It’s time to stop accommodating the crazies in America
- The value of perspective
- And then they voted Democrat in November
- Trump towers in his mastery of words to rally voters
- Planet Fitness loses $400 million in value after banning woman who exposed the company’s anti-female stance
- Schadenfreude: New movie labeling white people ‘dangerous animals’ flops at box office
- Why are American youths so unhappy?