Rand Paul: Keeping Medicaid expansion the 'big question' of Obamacare repeal
There is no issue more fraught with political danger in repealing Obamacare than the question of what to do about the expansion of Medicaid.
The majority of people who got insured under Obamacare got it by a massive expansion of the Medicaid entitlement program. Americans who live in households that show income 138% above the poverty line are currently eligible to receive Medicaid benefits.
Fully 15 million people have been added to the Medicaid rolls since Obamacare was implemented. Surprisingly, almost half of those people were already eligible for Medicaid but hadn't signed up for it previously. The rest of the enrollees took advantage of the expanded criteria for eligibility.
So it's not simply a question of rolling back Medicaid expansion and throwing 15 million people off their insurance. And Rand Paul recognizes the problem in repeal-replace.
The Kentucky Republican, who along with President-elect Donald Trump has come out strongly in favor of a simultaneously repeal-and-replace approach to the health care overhaul, was asked on CNN whether people covered under the law's expansion of Medicaid would continue to receive benefits after a potential repeal.
"That's the big question," he said on "State of the Union." "And I don't think that's going to be in the replacement aspect. I think that's going to be in the repeal aspect."
"The vast majority of people that got insurance under President Obama's Obamacare, the Affordable Care Act, got it through Medicaid," the Paul said. "What we have to decide is what can be kept and what can't be kept. And that's going to be part of repeal."
Paulagain stressed the need for a same day repeal-and-replace approach.
"We have had six years to complain. And we have complained. I have been one of those complaining about Obamacare," Paul said. "Replacement should be the same day."

In any replacement bill, the problem of subsidies is going to have to be addressed. Allowing taxpayers to subsidize someone who makes 148% above the poverty level will have to go. But at the same time, Obamacare-mandated coverages will have to be repealed so that insurance companies have the flexibility to offer cheaper plans. In effect, employing market-friendly reforms will reduce the need for subsidies and allow more people to gain access to cheaper insurance plans.
Perhaps some kind of deal can be struck that will include a minimal expansion of Medicaid for all states in exchange for more flexibility for insurance companies like a higher deductible and the ability to sell policies across state lines.
Simply repealing Obamacare will not be enough. Making health insurance more market-friendly will do more to reduce costs than anything Obama ever proposed.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Antisemitism in the Guise of Humanism
- Escaping the State of Sin
- Outsquatting the Squatters
- From Illegal Alien Invaders to Newcomers to Democrats
- The Impact of China-Linked Contractors on U.S. Security
- Debunking the Stupid, Yet Passionately Held, Myths About the 1994 Crime Bill
- The Death of the American Salesman
- The Alarm Bell Is Clanging
- Voting and the Meaning of Honor
- Exploding The Myth That Islam Is An Abrahamic Religion
Blog Posts
- So was Hunter Biden 'Our Man in Ukraine'?
- The suspect who smashed Kaylee Gain’s head into the pavement claims she’s the victim
- About those innocent Palestinian civilians...
- The GOP seems to be on the verge of capitulating before the Democrats, again!
- Biden and the insurmountable
- Universe twice as old as we’ve been told?
- Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
- Can Letitia James handle the rough world of property management?
- It’s time to stop accommodating the crazies in America
- The value of perspective
- And then they voted Democrat in November
- Trump towers in his mastery of words to rally voters
- Planet Fitness loses $400 million in value after banning woman who exposed the company’s anti-female stance
- Schadenfreude: New movie labeling white people ‘dangerous animals’ flops at box office
- Why are American youths so unhappy?