Presidential power: Levers and pulleys
Emma Bull once said coincidence is the word we use when we can't see the levers and pulleys. In the wake of the president's visit abroad, during which we have seen numerous images of pomp and pageantry, three remarkable developments have taken place, away from the spotlight.
On Tuesday, the Senate majority leader – a member of the president's own party – was quoted as saying, "I don't know how we get to 50 [votes] at the moment" when asked about legislation to repeal and replace Obamacare, which has passed the House of Representatives and now moved to the Senate. It would seem that this is a clear message to the president that something he very much wants might be in jeopardy.
Shortly after, the president's secretary of state, when asked about the Paris Climate Accord, told reporters aboard Air Force One, "The president indicated we're still thinking about that, that he hasn't made a final decision. He, I think ... would be taking up for a decision when we return from this trip." Since the Senate majority leader is from one of the states that depends on the continued burning of coal, oil, and gas (a practice the Accord would seek to restrict), it seems that this is a clear message to the Senate majority leader that something he very much wants might be in jeopardy.
And just this morning, it was announced that the Senate majority leader has joined 21 other senators – all in his own party - urging the president to follow through on his campaign pledge to pull out of the Paris Climate Accord.
Coincidence? Perhaps. Or perhaps this simply a case of the use of levers and pulleys we can't see?
Notice that I have not used any names. This is because the names do not matter. This could be any president, any Senate majority leader, or any secretary. Democrat or Republican, liberal or conservative, it does not matter. This is not about party – this is about strategy and tactics. What tactics must I employ to achieve the objective I seek? The names may change, but the principles do not. If you are going to war – and politics is nothing more that warfare concealed – then you should remember the words of an ancient Chinese philosopher: victorious warriors win first, and then go to war.
We do not know how this will all play out. There may be other levers and pulleys yet to come. But one thing seems clear: our current president not only understands this, but is adept at practicing it as well.
Ad Free / Commenting Login
FOLLOW US ON
Recent Articles
- Antisemitism in the Guise of Humanism
- Escaping the State of Sin
- Outsquatting the Squatters
- From Illegal Alien Invaders to Newcomers to Democrats
- The Impact of China-Linked Contractors on U.S. Security
- Debunking the Stupid, Yet Passionately Held, Myths About the 1994 Crime Bill
- The Death of the American Salesman
- The Alarm Bell Is Clanging
- Voting and the Meaning of Honor
- Exploding The Myth That Islam Is An Abrahamic Religion
Blog Posts
- So was Hunter Biden 'Our Man in Ukraine'?
- The suspect who smashed Kaylee Gain’s head into the pavement claims she’s the victim
- About those innocent Palestinian civilians...
- The GOP seems to be on the verge of capitulating before the Democrats, again!
- Biden and the insurmountable
- Universe twice as old as we’ve been told?
- Ketanji Brown Jackson is a fascist who should be removed from the Court
- Can Letitia James handle the rough world of property management?
- It’s time to stop accommodating the crazies in America
- The value of perspective
- And then they voted Democrat in November
- Trump towers in his mastery of words to rally voters
- Planet Fitness loses $400 million in value after banning woman who exposed the company’s anti-female stance
- Schadenfreude: New movie labeling white people ‘dangerous animals’ flops at box office
- Why are American youths so unhappy?